IRIN PlusNews HIV/AIDS News and information service | Hayden's Diary
Sunday 26 February 2006
Home About PlusNews Country Profiles News Briefs Special Reports Subscribe Archive IRINnews
?

Regions

Africa
East Africa
Great Lakes
Horn of Africa
Southern Africa
West Africa
Weekly
RSSyndication
RSS - News Briefs

Features

PlusNews E-mail Subscription
HIV Prevention 101: Ignoring the Church's views on condoms

Dear Diary,

A flurry of news this past month about the Catholic Church's opposition to condoms has forced me to question its role in the global struggle against HIV and AIDS.

In my opinion, the Vatican, with its firm anti-latex stance and undying call for abstinence, is unwittingly putting many of its followers, as well as non-believers, at risk of HIV infection.

This was particularly evident in the recent criticism of South Africa by the Southern African Catholic Bishops Conference (SACBC), for encouraging condom use in its prevention campaigns.

The SACBC argued that the prophylactics promoted promiscuity rather than helping to curb the spread of HIV.

Citing abstinence as the best method for preventing infection, SACBC president Cardinal Wilfred Napier charged that promiscuity was more damaging than the virus.

In reality, abstinence is usually only achieved within the walls of a convent or monastery ... and even that is debatable.

While the Church's dogged determination in imposing its view that abstinence is the ideal way of guarding against infection might seem admirable, the magnitude of the current pandemic shows that ours is far from being an ideal world.

Nowhere does this statement hold more truth than in South Africa, where an estimated 2 out of every 10 people are living with HIV and AIDS.

The numbers are a stark reminder that people are choosing sexual intercourse above abstinence.

These alarming statistics also make it is easy to suggest that at least some of the 8 out of 10 who are fortunate enough to be HIV-free could, at some point, become intimately involved with an infected person.

As most sexually active individuals will agree, the laws of human attraction stipulate that in the presence of raging hormones, lust will successfully cancel logic.

With the world's largest number of HIV-positive people - some 5 million - the government is courageously going against the Church's beliefs by advocating the use of condoms as the main shield against millions more becoming part of the horrific AIDS figures.

With the fight against the pandemic losing ground in most developing countries, the condom is still seen by many healthcare workers and educators as the first line of defence in preventing the transmission of HIV.

And rightfully so.

Research suggests that the contraceptives are at least 98 percent safe, with the outstanding 2 percent often depending on how correctly they are used.

But the Church accentuates the uselessness of condoms, and maintains that only drastic change in sexual behaviour will stop the spread of the HI virus.

The condom is believed to have originated around 1,000 BC, when the ancient Egyptians used a linen sheath for protection against disease.

In the 1500s, when a syphilis epidemic spread across Europe, a similar device was used to protect men against infection, and by the late 1700s handmade condoms were being advertised and sold in London.

The condom, it would seem, predates the Catholic Church, which only came into existence in the late 4th century.

So if it was used to prevent sexually transmitted infections, why should it lose its credibility in the face of something much more devastating?

For anyone in an HIV-positive/negative relationship, the pros of condom use far outweigh the cons when it comes to keeping your partner safe from infection.

Cardinal Napier, slamming official policy on supplying free condoms, said: "Government speaks about moral regeneration, but it does not think how the promotion of condoms affects human behaviour."

It seems the cardinal and the Vatican fail to realise that human behaviour is just that, and sex, unprotected or otherwise, will always be an integral part of human behaviour.


Forever positive,

Hayden Horner



Previous Entry :: All Diary Entries :: Next Entry
Diary Entries
HIV/AIDS Coping Mechanisms: "What would a mayfly do?"
Beyond the Borders of HIV/AIDS Treatment Strategies
HIV/AIDS Feminisation: A new wine in an old bottle
Antiretrovirals - The Wind Beneath My Wings
The Mis-education of HIV/AIDS Clinicians
HIV Prevention 101: Ignoring the Church's views on condoms
Stigma and HIV/AIDS: lethal bedfellows
In remembrance of our women and children
Maids, madams and the "terrible thing"
Internet love and inter-related HIV-prejudice
Previously eyes-wide-shut on HIV and religion
Love, lies and disclosure
Black pot and blacker kettle
Things better left unsaid on the bus
Food for thought while waiting to die
Test results not all good
Diary speaks back
The truth about disclosure

[Back] [Home Page]

Click here to send any feedback, comments or questions you have about PlusNews Website or if you prefer you can send an Email to Webmaster

Copyright ? IRIN 2006
The material contained on www.PlusNews.org comes to you via IRIN, a UN humanitarian news and information service, but may not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its agencies.
All PlusNews material may be reposted or reprinted free-of-charge; refer to the IRIN copyright page for conditions of use. IRIN is a project of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.